Once More Into the Breach

Finding Nonsense and Beating it Sensible

My Photo
Location: Virginia

I used to watch TV news and yell at the box. Now I jump up from the couch, sit at the computer and begin to type laughing maniacally saying "Wait until they read this." It's more fun than squashing tadpoles

Free Kareem

Subscribe to Once More Into the Breach


Friday, April 07, 2006

San Francisco Passes Anti Catholic Resolution

San Francisco's Board of Supervisors have come unhinged. Not that they were swinging normal to start with, but they have abandoned even the pretense of membership to American society. One expects the usual anti military greenie weenie silliness that has become a staple of the landscape. Increasingly it has become the front on the effort to normalize and indoctrinate homosexuality. The most glaring expression of this is the outright hatred and hostility toward the Christian Church.

Last week the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution condemning a rally of young people by a Christian organization. They called it an "'act of provocation' by an 'anti-gay,' 'anti-choice' organization that aimed to 'negatively influence the politics of America's most tolerant and progressive city.'" Not satisfied with that, they have now condemned the Catholic Church for not violating their conscience and continuing their long time practice of placing adoptions because the city requires they adopt out children to Gay "couples."

The resolution alludes to the Vatican as a foreign country meddling in the affairs of the city and describes the church's moral teaching and beliefs as "insulting to all San Franciscans ," "hateful," "insulting and callous," "defamatory," "absolutely unacceptable," "insensitive and ignorant."

The resolution calls on the local archbishop to "defy" the church's teachings and describes Cardinal William Joseph Levada, the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is responsible for safeguarding the doctrine on the faith and morals of the church throughout the Catholic world, as "unqualified" to lead.

This action prompted a quick reaction from the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights. The Political leaders of San Francisco seem to have trouble with the First Amendment when it is applied to others besides themselves.

Robert Muise, the Law Center attorney handling the case, argued the Constitution "forbids hostility toward any religion."

"In total disregard for the Constitution, homosexual activists in positions of authority in San Francisco are abusing their authority as government officials and misusing the instruments of government to attack the Catholic Church," he said. "This egregious abuse of power is an outrage and a clear violation of the First Amendment."

The City of San Francisco's Leadership is seeking to place an ideological wall around themselves at the same time they dismiss their critics as being intolerant. I have long ago stopped expecting the left to be consistent or even tolerant. They want not only to pursue their libertine lifestyles, but they want to be assured that everyone will not only celebrate their proclivities, but relieve them of the consequences of their activities. They want to be left alone while at the same time shove their opinions in everyone's face. They hate the Church because it still holds to the concept of normal and perverse. They won't live and let live so it looks like we're in for a fight.

Basil's Blog Links


Anonymous rev andre r boulanger said...

Your ideological wall is showing.
We all have them, don't we?

12:11 AM  
Blogger Xyba said...

I don't pretend to hide it.

11:49 AM  
Blogger Vincent Bemowski said...


There are two basic degrees or types of homosexuality. Individuals in the first group may, or may not be aware of their mental disorder, and therefore not all will see the need to seek professional counseling. This group struggles with their unnatural feelings and prefers to keep them private, and they deserve our compassion.

Some women who have a domineering father will only be attracted to those of their own sex because they have learned not to respect men. The same is true of some men who have a domineering mother. Others, should one of their parents/guardians not truly love them, from a very early age may unconsciously imitate certain masculine or feminine characteristics of the parent/guardian that they most admired. However, not all become homosexuals - as with every human being, our moral state determines our ability to resist the temptations we experience.

The other more severe type is made up of individuals who are “avowed,” practicing homosexuals. Through their own free will, they choose to live an immoral lifestyle. These individuals do not seek to change or confess their sinfulness - they have no shame, and most have many partners. They desire acceptance of the scandal they create, and are openly proud of their unnatural behavior. These type homosexuals and lesbians seek the “right” to publicly practice their unnatural behavior, and accuse anyone who admonishes them of being “prejudiced,” or of “discrimination.”

These individuals, and others who live immoral lives, as well as those who give their approval or “consent” to morally sick lifestyles, are included in the warnings and condemnations recorded throughout Sacred Scripture. For example: “They who do such things, are worthy of death (Hell), and not only they who do them, but they also that CONSENT to them that do them” (Romans 1:32).

12:04 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home